| speedypete202 |
22 Jan 2016 13:38:57 |
| [Report] I had been waiting for V3.01 to arrive and will re write this for the new route at some point. I will also swap out whatever Pendolino I seem to have picked up and replace it with the one you have suggested. |
|
| chrisonline |
19 Jan 2016 14:34:36 |
| [Report] Could I suggest this is re-written to reflect the updated v3.01 of the route? Many markers have changed. Also, what Virgin Class 390 is this? The normal one used is UKTS 22899 (over 17,000 downloads!!!) but this is NOT that one, and it is missing when loading the scenario. It appears to point to the Default loco folder, but that is not actually a working model, only various common features. Thanks |
|
| speedypete202 |
10 Jan 2016 13:30:37 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Those issues have been rectified and a new file is uploaded. |
|
| nigeldarl5 |
10 Jan 2016 12:55:55 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
made a screen print of the problem with the 378
http://i766.photobucket.com/albums/xx310/nigeldarl/Screenshot_%20WCML%20London%20amp%20the%20Midlands%20V3_51.52928--0.13459_14-50-10_zpsg7coqnkh.jpg |
|
| nigeldarl5 |
10 Jan 2016 12:52:28 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
still got the problem also the london overground train split as it was comming in and the last carrage is on the next platform.
also saying the class 390 VT is missing. |
|
| gptech |
09 Jan 2016 16:06:25 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Conburt; for future reference in case you come across the situation again, simply use Windows Explorer to navigate to the scenarios location and delete the files. Namemyroute.exe in the RailWorks folder will tell you the route and scenario GUIDs. |
|
| conburt |
09 Jan 2016 14:51:48 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Thanks |
|
| speedypete202 |
09 Jan 2016 13:38:25 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Hi
There is no need to now. I have re-uploaded the file without the currentsave. |
|
| conburt |
09 Jan 2016 11:13:58 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
gptech
How do we remove the current save and associated MD5 file? |
|
| gptech |
09 Jan 2016 09:24:18 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Also, those having bother....did you remove the CurrentSave.bin file and it's associated MD5 file? These may be loading, or at least being recognised by the game, as well as your initial start. |
|
| gptech |
09 Jan 2016 09:21:20 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
The only reason a scenario could affect scenery objects is by having that many running services that it hogs the RAM, hence the scenery not loading. Those having bother: load it and wait. Time it, if it gets to 3 minutes without scenery appearing then try something else if you want, but if you give it enough time I'm sure you'll see scenery jump into view. |
|
| speedypete202 |
08 Jan 2016 21:00:53 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
I will do some more testing and try to work out what the fault might be.
|
|
| nigeldarl5 |
08 Jan 2016 19:59:57 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
made sure everything is downloaded but getting error of missing stock ie class 390 vt
also no platforms showing at euston and passengers seem to be like ghosts just blank figues.
was so bad had to delete senario. |
|
| speedypete202 |
08 Jan 2016 11:31:22 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Hmm,
Not sure on this one. My only guess is that it might be something to do with the volume of assets loaded but, as I say, it is a guess.
I wonder if anyone else can shed some light on the issue? |
|
| conburt |
08 Jan 2016 11:22:19 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Hi
Installed the scenario only to find that the tracks are not right and there are no platforms @ London Euston. I have never known a scenario affect scenery before. Did a check on other scenarios starting at London Euston and the tracks and platforms are fine. |
|
| speedypete202 |
08 Jan 2016 09:00:19 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Oops! I didn't realise that I had packaged the save files as well. I will get that sorted.
It's a great route and I had previously created scenarios for the original but need to re-create them for this one.
Hoping to have some more uploaded soon
|
|
| gptech |
07 Jan 2016 20:38:16 |
[Report] Note: The file has been updated since this comment was written
Nice to se another scenario for this route, thanks very much. I'm privileged to be running a Beta version of the next incarnation of the route, and your scenario ports over and runs nicely---took a little editing as some markers and portals have new names, but nothing major.
My one tiny, very tiny, criticism is that the scenario comes with a CurrentSave.bin and associated .MD5 files; I doubt there'd be many who'd want to resume the scenario from where you left off!
All in all though, a very enjoyable drive, well done! |
|
